|
Does the Bible Forbid Women to be Preachers?
How Scripture Portrays Women's Roles in the Church
©
Rebecca Craig
Oct 7, 2008
Few issues have been as divisive within the church as the question regarding the leadership roles of women.
For centuries, 1 Timothy 2:11-15 and 1 Corinthians 14:33-35 have been utilized to uphold the practice of forbidding women to have leadership roles within the church. What few realize, however, is that scripture passages like these seem to fly in the face of other scriptural passages that uphold and edify women’s roles as leaders. So how are people to interpret these passages in light of the rest of scripture?
Paul and the Women of Corinth
If 1 Cor. 14 is to be upheld as a church-wide mandate, Paul has problems within the context of his own letter. In 1 Cor. 11:4, Paul sets out a standard of dress for women who pray and “prophesy.” Now many would argue that to “prophesy” is different than “preaching,” but in the Greek, the word “propheteuo” means “to proclaim God’s message,” “to preach,” and “to speak God’s message intelligibly” (as opposed to speaking in tongues).[1]
Given the need for a covering over their heads, it is apparent that men were present when these women were preaching. Thus, either Paul suddenly gets amnesia when he makes the statement later in chapter 14 that women should remain silent, or Paul is addressing an entirely different issue. The latter seems the most likely, since by chapter 14, the topic of conversation has shifted to the subject of spiritual gifts and, in particular, the inappropriate use of the gift of tongues. Given the ecstatic, frenzied nature of the pagan rituals that many of the Corinthians would have been partial to, maintaining order and putting the best face on the church as possible was of the utmost concern to Paul. If that meant women needed to refrain from the act of speaking in tongues, then so be it.
Problems with False Teachers in Ephesus
The 1 Timothy text finds itself in a similar situation. Timothy’s congregation was located in Ephesus, an equally pagan city that, as referenced earlier in Timothy, had been subject to many false teachers who were leading the congregation astray. Certain women in the church were falling prey to these false teachers, who were then, in turn, teaching the same false doctrines and drawing men away from the true teachings. This was creating a lot of disorder and dissension within the church, and Paul needed to establish some kind of rules to re-establish order in the church at Ephesus.
Other Scripture Passages that Uphold Women’s Leadership Roles in the Church
With these contexts in mind, one can now look at all the other places in the Bible where women were very clearly involved in leadership roles. In fact, Paul gives a litany of women who worked hard in the cause of the gospel in Romans 16, even going so far as to call one of these women, Junia, an apostle! In Philippians 4, Paul again lists several women who struggled beside him in the work of the gospel. Given the “gospel” is telling people about Christ, such work undoubtedly involved preaching and teaching. Interestingly, two of Paul’s prized students are a married couple, Priscilla and Aquila, but Priscilla is always mentioned first—an odd structure for Paul’s day. In Acts 18:25-26, both Priscilla and her husband Aquila take Apollos aside to instruct him on baptism. Priscilla is obviously involved in teaching a man here.
Acts 9:36 tells us of a female disciple, Tabitha (also called Dorcas). Given the definition and purpose of a disciple was to learn and eventually become like the Rabbi they were learning from, if women were not to become teachers or ministers, then they would not have been allowed to be disciples, either. Philip’s four daughters are also referenced as being prophets.
Jesus and Women
In the gospels as well Jesus treats women on a much more equal standing than was the custom of his day. The Samaritan woman was told to go tell the men of her town what she had seen and heard. Mary of Bethany sat at the feet of Jesus just as the male disciples did rather than doing traditional “women’s work” like her sister Martha, and Jesus’ response was that Mary was doing the better thing. And of course, one can’t forget that the very first evangelist to spread the good news of Jesus’ resurrection was, in fact, a woman—Mary Magdalene. If Jesus himself felt a woman was worthy of preaching such wondrous news, it seems shameful that so many churches have stifled this role.
Early Church Schism
In fact, women were very instrumental in the early church—that is until the schism between the Montanists[2] and the Orthodox church over two of Montanus’ female prophets, Maximilla and Prisca, who told of visions of Christ in the form of a woman. Because of this, by the fourth century, female prophetic activity ceased to be officially recognized, as female prophets were now regarded as especially suspicious, despite the history of female prophets throughout the Bible (Philip's daughters, Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, etc.).[3]
In the end, the question that must be asked is: which texts seem the most normative? The majority of the bible which upholds women as preachers and teachers, or these two texts that are pulled out of their context?
[1] UBS Greek Dictionary
[2] Montanism was a 2nd century Christian movement started near Phrygia by Montanus, who claimed to have received direct revelations from the Holy Spirit. For more information on this early Christian movement, http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10521a.htm
[3] Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe, eds., Women’s Bible Commentary, (Louisville: Westminister John Knox Press, 1998) p. 477
The copyright of the article Does the Bible Forbid Women to be Preachers? in Bible Studies is owned by Rebecca Craig. Permission to republish Does the Bible Forbid Women to be Preachers? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Comments
Oct 24, 2008 12:18 PM
Guest
:
Finally, someone tells the truth about women in ministry! Rev. Linda
Jan 27, 2009 10:28 PM
Guest
:
Someone once said you don't have to work very hard to twist scripture with
human reasoning to make it say what you want it to. 2 Timothy 4:3 says
"For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.
Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great
number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear."
What a shame you have not only failed to accept, but also to even
acknowledge the wonderful role God has given women. Anyone who has the
Spirit guiding them can clearly see the different roles God has designed
for men and women. That's why Paul explains 1 Timothy 2:12 by going back
to the beginning, Genesis, so there can be no doubt what he is talking
about. Woman was created after man to be his helpmate not his pastor. The
woman was deceived, not the man. That's why she must never be in a
position of authority.
I hope some day you will open your heart
to receive the truth, and that you will be able to accept scripture as God
inspired it, instead of the way you desire to interpret it.
Feb 18, 2009 12:10 PM
Guest
:
In response to the individual who made the previous comment... wow... who
needs to open their heart?? I don't think it's the author of this article,
who has obviously spent a great deal of time delving into and wrestling
with scripture. Typical male misogyny, though. And what a shame that this
individual is so closed-minded that he refuses to see that the Spirit
guides women, just like men, into ministry, and that the gospel cannot be
contained or limited by gender roles.
Thank you for writing this
article, Rebecca. Hopefully others whose hearts aren't so hardened can not
only see the wisdom inherent in your words but will eventually understand
how un-Christian their interpretation is. What was it Tony Campolo once
said? People such as this commenter are "instruments of the
devil," because they seek to oppress, which is the work of Satan.
FREEDOM however is the work of Christ. God bless you and your ministry.
Mar 27, 2009 2:37 PM
Guest
:
I always find it ironic that scripture is being "twisted" when it
doesn't agree with how someone else interprets it. Compelling points are
being made here that everyone should take note of, though. Thank you,
pastor, for your insightful and thoughtful work on these passages.
May 4, 2009 2:14 PM
Guest
:
How can the correlation between Adam & Eve and 1 Timothy be brushed
aside? There is a clear connection that can not be ignored. If roles are
defined because of events in the Garden of Eden then the implications most
certainly extend beyond Ephesus. Please explain.
May 4, 2009 9:07 PM
Rebecca Craig
:
Thank you for your comment/question - in response... first, the CREATION of
Adam and Eve was on even footing. "Male and female he created
them" (Gen 1:27) In Gen. 2, the woman is created to be a
"helpmate"... just as God is a "helpmate" to man as
well - however one would never subject God to a demeaned role as a
"helper". Second - if you are talking about the "curse"
on Eve and her "desire" for her husband and the fact that her
husband shall "rule" over her - one must ask the question as to
whether this a descriptive or prescriptive statement? Is God simply
pointing out what the natural consequences of sin will be in male/female
relationships or is he ordaining it to be this way? I say it is the latter
- the consequences of sin result in this desire for both to attempt to
dominate. It is the battle of the sexes - who rules the roost? Woman
attempts to dominate, man responds by controlling and demeaning her,
putting her in her "proper" place. Thus, my third point should
also answer this by pointing out that Christ is the great equalizer...
male/female relationships were skewed by sin - women "desired" to
dominate their husbands, and the male lashback was to rule with an iron
fist over women. Christ, however, puts the male/female relationship back
into it's proper place - ie: 1 Corinthians 7... the understanding was that
men owned a woman's body - and Paul upholds that, but then he turns around
and points out that women also own their husband's body... something that
would have been a shock to the Jews and Greeks of the first century. Also,
the Ephesians 5:21 on text points out how women should treat their
husbands, but also points out how men should treat their wives.
"Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ." ONE
ANOTHER... this is mutually submissive language. Christ is the great
equalizer. The male/female relationship is now on even ground, it is a
partnership, not a "domination" by one or the other, as it was
meant to be from the beginning.
May 4, 2009 9:08 PM
Rebecca Craig
:
oops, I meant to say it is the "FORMER" not the latter in regards
to it being a DESCRIPTIVE, not a prescriptive statement.
Jun 1, 2009 7:11 PM
Guest
:
Guest; Re: Jan.27th comment. I to believe the Bible is God's inspired
word, but the Lord has dealt with me also concerning scripture in Joel
2:28, (are we not living in the last day's?) and the book of Esther. We
can't put God in a shoe box.
Jun 1, 2009 9:19 PM
Rebecca Craig
:
Interesting thought/comment regarding Joel 2:28 - God pouring his spirit
upon "all flesh". God's spirit here (and at Pentecost where the
fulfillment of this passage began according to Peter in Acts 2) knows no
boundaries. Old, young, male, female, slave, free - God's spirit doesn't
recognize the barriers we put up, and He is not limited in who He uses to
proclaim His gospel. Thank you for your comment.
Jun 15, 2009 1:33 PM
Guest
:
The roles of women in the church are not demeaning . The church of God has
order and as exemplified by Christ's subjection to the Father, so also must
the women be subject to the men. Jesus said that He and the Father are one,
yet they are equal. A woman can serve in many important roles in the
Church, but not as a pastor/elder/bishop. To elevate the roles of women in
the church to the roles of pastors is taking a centimeter when you are
given an inch.
Jun 17, 2009 5:47 AM
Guest
:
I'm still amazed at how people can pick and choose what they want to
believe/follow from the bible and then use that oppress others. Example -
the person above uses the whole headship thing to defend his stance that
women have no right to deliver God's words of grace and love to groups of
people - men included. However, this person completely ignores 1
Corinthians, where a woman is told how to dress when she preaches. Not to
mention the fact that the idea of "headship" is a completely
different issue that has to do with MARITAL relationships, not leadership
in the church! (From Ephesians 5, which I actually think Pr. Craig has
written about as well) KNOW YOUR CONTEXT and ALL of your scripture, not
just bits and pieces of it, before you start spouting off harmful and
hateful dogma. It's people like this that probably still think we should be
slave owners because the Bible says slaves should respect their masters.
Know the Biblical context, people!
Jun 23, 2009 8:27 AM
Guest
:
Thank you for this article. In response to the comment: "The
woman was deceived, not the man. That's why she must never be in a position
of authority. I hope some day you will open your heart to receive the
truth, and that you will be able to accept scripture as God inspired it,
instead of the way you desire to interpret it."
I totally
agree! Women should not be in authority at YOUR place of worship: they
should NOT be in authority of 1) your music (choir director is
probably female) 2) your pot-luck dinners (the man should cook his
own food, a kitchen is a dangerous strong-hold of authority) 3)
cleaning/decorating the church (getting to dust and sweep and put flowers
out to honor God is symbolic of the respect for the Trinity. A woman will
do this out of love of God, but you got watch them, because they might
trick somebody with those peace lillies.)
Woman is still being
deceived by man. Woman should drive said man to church and drop him
off at the front door and come pick him up later. Woman should find a
different church from this particular person's.
12 Comments
|